Sort-of Suffolk wikileaks: what the people of Suffolk really think about the Big Society

Back in December I put in a Freedom of Information request (so not really wikileaks territory) to see all the responses to the public engagement process launched (in a hurry and under pressure from the Green and Independents on the Council) before Suffolk County Council voted to approve its ‘New Strategic Direction’.  For those who need reminding, the New Strategic Direction is the idea (I hesitate to call it a plan) by which all of the services provided by Suffolk County Council will be divested to private sector contractors, or social enterprises.   The delay does not appear to have been the Council’s fault, simply an issue with a mis-placed email.

You can download the documents I received here:

results as of 22nd November FOI

Concerns and Opportunities FOI 22nd Nov

Additional feedback collated through meetings and events and including correspondence received

A quick read, especially of the document called ‘Concerns and Opportunities’ is really quite revealing.

Firstly, there do not appear to be any opportunities identified.  I have asked the Council if they have neglected to send me the responses that identified opportunities, or if it was that case that no opportunities were identified.  I have yet to hear back.

(Update 15/2/11: I have just been sent a revised document which does contain the opportunities, although many are phrased thus – “The only opportunities are for the public sector to rid itself of the responsibilities of providing services that they are legally obliged to do, handing them over to people who will not run them well but for a profit – cutting services and staff and destroying the social support framework – or people who will run services badly leading to the loss of the services. But it is a good opportunity for certain individuals to enhance their political reputations.” Here is the revised documement Concerns and Opportunities FOI 22nd Nov-2)

Second, it is clear that the people of Suffolk are a very sensible bunch.  So sensible you might even, for example, want them to run local government services across the county (now there’s a thought).  What emerges, in the most part, is a series of very considered points that make the case that the ‘New Strategic Direction’ (read Big Society) is a very silly thing to do, being done in a very silly way.  The latter, i.e. the total lack of any coherent plan or management process, probably being the most coherent and strongest of all the concerns raised.  My soundbite on this one is “ideology on the one hand and incompetence on the other”.  Something that appears to becoming the calling card of this Conservative-led government in much the same way as manipulation and deceit became the calling card of New Labour.

Council Leader, Jeremy Pembroke and CEO, Andrea Hill have, I hope, read these documents.  There is much in it that they could learn.

I have not gone through the information in detail – I am making this information available as soon as I have received it so that anyone can examine it.  I will, however, sit down and digest it more thoroughly and will post any further observations.

P.S I notice that David Cameron is spending today trying to explain the Big Society.   Here is one of Cameron’s ‘chaps’ doing this late last year.  You can see why Dave thought he needed to have a go himself.


5 Responses to “Sort-of Suffolk wikileaks: what the people of Suffolk really think about the Big Society”

  1. 1 Simon February 15, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    Strategic Direction

    Am I along in thinking the only direction things are heading is down the plughole?

    • 2 richardstacy February 15, 2011 at 2:52 pm

      If you read the responses to the Council’s engagement exercise you will realise that the only people who are alone are those who think the New Strategic Direction is a good idea.

  2. 3 Paige R. Hurley January 23, 2013 at 9:04 pm

    Writing back in April 2011 just after the New Strategic Direction started to collapse Lib Dem County Councillor Craig Dearden-Phillips said: Interestingly, my hunch is that, once the dust settles the new leadership will embark on a path that isn’t much different from the New Strategic Direction set out by Andrea Hill. It will have a different name. It will be slower, more consultative and done with less pzazz. But the essentials of it – divestment of council services, the build-up of community capability and a new role for the council as commissioner rather than provider will, over time, prevail. Looks like he was right!

    • 4 richardstacy January 24, 2013 at 9:09 am

      Unfortunately I think you (and he) are right, with a couple of amendments. We are not seeing the build-up of community capability – it is all being pushed-out to the large contracting organisations such as Serco. I am also not sure that we are seeing more consultation. SCC knows what happens when you consult on this – near universal opposition. The one productive factor of Andrea Hill’s ego was the pzazz, because this galvanised opposition.

  1. 1 Tweets that mention Sort-of Suffolk wikileaks: what the people of Suffolk really think about the Big Society « Big Society Suffolk -- Trackback on February 15, 2011 at 11:47 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Read the real story of the Big Society

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7 other followers

Follow on Twitter

Join the Facebook community


%d bloggers like this: